I’m super excited to have been invited to join a blog group alongside three talented bloggers. Each week, one of us chooses a topic and we all post a blog entry on that topic, usually on Thursdays.
Here are the links to the other fabulous blogs:
Froggie chose this week’s topic: Feminism.
I’ve
never liked the word feminism. It
confuses me. I’ve never even known
what it means. I looked it up, and
Wikipedia defines feminism as “a
collection of movements and ideologies aimed at defining, establishing, and
defending equal
political, economic, cultural, and social rights for women. This includes seeking to establish equal opportunities
for women in education and employment.”
I
grew up in what many consider the heyday of the “women’s rights” movement, and
I spent my early years watching ERA rallies on television. I have vague recollections of watching
busy haired Gloria Steinem on the news, and I know many of the words to Helen
Reddy’s I Am Woman. I watched perfume commercials about
bringing home the bacon, frying it up in a pan, and never, ever letting some
guy forget he’s a man. You might
think that would have affected me somehow, pushed me down the feminist path,
but it didn’t. I was too young to
understand. And I could not stand
the sound of Ms. Reddy’s voice. Or
the smell of Enjoli perfume.
But
more than that, I simply did not feel “inferior” or in need of equality. Which is a bit astounding, given the
world in which I was raised. My
parents embraced traditional roles:
my Dad worked two jobs so my Mom could stay home and raise my sister and
me. Mom cooked and cleaned and
shopped, using the money my Dad gave her each week. My Mom didn’t even drive a car, having never learned. My Dad hadn’t wanted her to, and she
concurred. At my Catholic school,
girls and boys were treated rather equally, except girls had to wear skirts and
boys got to be altar boys. Perhaps
I didn’t care enough to feel these inequalities were oppressive. More likely, I was too young and too
distracted to weigh these things in any meaningful way.
Later,
when I could understand equal pay for equal work, etc., I still opted not to
embrace feminism as such. I
believed the best way to fix a broken system was from within, and so if I
wanted change, I believed I needed to become part of the system to facilitate that
change. For my second career, I chose
one dominated by men: the
law. Law school enrollment was
creeping up near the 50/50 mark when I started, but it wasn’t quite there. My professors were overwhelmingly male
(though, ironically, one of my professors was Catherine MacKinnon, a well-known
feminist). Law school felt even
and fair, at least so far as gender – and even though I completed law school
while taking care of a young child.
But the actual practice of law proved, indeed, to be a man’s world. For every one female judge, I faced
fifteen or twenty males. In the
overcrowded Daley Center elevators, I was usually the only female attorney
(though female office staff abounded).
At the last firm at which I worked, no women has ever made partner. Ever. Misogyny runs rampant in the law, and believe no male who
tells you differently. Women are
seen as “less than,” even the most brilliant. Hell, when I was interviewing for jobs after graduation, I
was told – more than once – to wear a suit with a skirt and not trousers. Nice, huh?
And
yet, still, I feel no pull toward feminism. Instead, my fellow female counselors and I learned to use
our “weaker gender” status to our advantage. I have been condescended to many, many times. I have former female associates who
have been treated like children or, worse, like Barbie dolls. I’ve been called, “Honey” – by a judge. I’ve been flirted with and
underestimated. And I say, bring
it on. Because, truly, there is
nothing better than stepping from a place of perceived weakness and raining
holy legal hell on my opponent, who never saw it coming. My opponent’s flawed perception of me
doesn’t hurt me, not at all. I
know my worth, both as an attorney and as a woman. And the longer I step up and fight back, within the system,
the sooner that change toward equality will be effected.
Do
I think women deserve equal pay for equal work? Of course, and I can see that happening in my lifetime. But I understand male resistance to
this doctrine. After all, women
can do everything a man can do, but that doesn’t work both ways. Men cannot birth children (not yet,
anyway); moreover, although many males choose to stay home and raise their
children while their wives work, this role reversal is hardly completely
embraced by society. For these
reasons alone, many men cling to the “traditional” roles foisted upon
them. In that way, women are at an
advantage, as society no longer thinks twice about a woman who chooses a career
– indeed, we raise our girls to make such a choice – and we are equally supportive
of those women who opt to stay home.
The ball field is a little murkier for women who attempt to juggle both,
and perhaps that is the cost of “feminism.” Having it “all” – be us male or female – comes at a price,
not because of gender, but because there are only 24 hours in a day.
For
my own children, all girls, I will support whichever road they choose: career, stay-at-home parent, a
combo. I do hope they will take
the time to learn a skill, just to have something to fall back on because life
is unpredictable and it isn’t always wise to depend on one’s spouse in the way
my Mom has done. What matters to
me is that my daughters know they are equal to men, regardless of what society
tells them, regardless of any judge who calls them “Honey.” Go ahead, girls: Roar!
Bonus content: One of the worse commercials ever made: Enjoli